Showing posts with label Epistemology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Epistemology. Show all posts
Saturday, August 01, 2015

Deduction, Induction, TAG and Certainty

›
Deduction as a construct does not bring forth certainty any more than induction. Inductivists try to move from what might be thought to be ...
99 comments:
Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Question Begging From Another Radical 2 Kingdom Proponent

›
I'm publishing this piece again because I've been reminded of late that the Escondido crowd remains loud and a problematic force aga...
21 comments:
Saturday, June 27, 2015

God is not mocked...the fool is confounded once again

›
Easily, less than five percent of the U.S. population is homosexual. So, why is it that being pro-homosexual is advantageous for one seeking...
Sunday, March 29, 2015

A Christian Reason for Celebrating Easter

›
Induction, the basis for all scientific inference, presupposes the uniformity of nature, which is to say it operates under the principle of...
23 comments:
Saturday, January 25, 2014

Scripturalism, Skepticism and Knowledge of Personal Salvation

›
Scripturalism does not allow one to know he is saved. It only allows one to know propositions contained in, or deducible from, Scripture. ...
23 comments:
Saturday, January 18, 2014

Epistemology and Quasi-Gettier Considerations

›
"And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I c...
5 comments:
Thursday, September 26, 2013

Confusion Over The Transcendental Argument For The Existence Of God

›
Generally speaking TAG is a deductive argument, but it is unlike all other deductive arguments. What sets TAG apart from garden variety de...
227 comments:
Tuesday, June 18, 2013

John Piper on God and Fathers

›
"The children will have years of exposure to what the universe is like before they know there is a universe. They will experience t...
5 comments:
Friday, January 06, 2012

A Couple of Oldies But Goodies by Michael Butler

›
Here is a very accessible introduction to Presuppostional Apologetics, written by Michael Butler (Greg Bahnsen's protégé).   Also, he...
1 comment:
Sunday, July 17, 2011

Two non-theonomic reviews of David VanDrunen's "A Biblical Case for Natural Law"

›
Nelson D. Kloosterman’s review of A Biblical Case for Natural Law , by David VanDrunen John Frame’s review of the same.
Monday, May 30, 2011

More on Paradox

›
If God is good, then he cannot ordain evil. God ordains evil and is good. Therefore, I have to accept "by faith" that although wha...
4 comments:
Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Infallibility & The Canon

›
Certainly Romanists should agree that God is at least capable of bringing to pass his eternal plan and purpose without making his volition...
8 comments:
Saturday, March 20, 2010

Van Til, Bahnsen, Logic and TAG

›
“To us the only thing of great significance in this connection is that it is often found to be more difficult to distinguish our method fr...
39 comments:
Saturday, January 05, 2008

Bridging The Gap A Bit

›
Romans 1: 18-21 teaches many things including all men know God through revelation. “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against al...
20 comments:
Monday, June 25, 2007

Even Understanding Aquinnah at Dusk is a Matter of Faith, not Sight

›
Faith then understanding is the necessary order of embracing the beauty and wisdom of all we would otherwise never understand. Whereas the ...
3 comments:
Sunday, May 14, 2006

The Neccessity of Scripture in Justifying (even) Logic

›
Since no man has observed every instance of the law of non-contradiction no man can justify an a priori knowledge of the universal, invaria...
11 comments:
Friday, May 12, 2006

More on Induction and Knowledge

›
If knowledge is so broad as to include things believed by inductive inference, then either one can know something on faulty justification (e...
20 comments: